Surprisingly, MACC’s deputy chief commissioner Datuk Mohd Shukri Abdul told a news conference there was no case of graft. He inexplicably maintained that there were no financial irregularities in the purchase of the two pairs of binoculars but conceded the department had ignored Treasury procedures. Surely the question is, WHY?
READ MORE.
No case of graft? How did MACC prove it?
Even though there is no case of graft, does that mean no one should be held responsible?
No comments:
Post a Comment